翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ New York Handicap Triple
・ New York Harbor
・ New York Harbor School
・ New York hardcore
・ New York Harp Ensemble
・ New York Heart Association Functional Classification
・ New York Helicopter
・ New York Herald
・ New York EP
・ New York Etching Club
・ New York Euphoria
・ New York Evening Express
・ New York Evening Mail
・ New York Evening Post Building
・ New York Evening Telegram
New York ex rel. Cutler v. Dibble
・ New York Exercise Support Ribbon
・ New York Express
・ New York Eye and Ear Control
・ New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
・ New York Family Court
・ New York Farm Winery Act of 1976
・ New York Fashion Week
・ New York Female Giants
・ New York Female Moral Reform Society
・ New York Feminist Art Institute
・ New York Festival of Light
・ New York Festival of Song
・ New York Fever (album)
・ New York Field Club


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

New York ex rel. Cutler v. Dibble : ウィキペディア英語版
New York ex rel. Cutler v. Dibble

''New York ex rel. Cutler v. Dibble'', 62 U.S. (21 How.) 366 (1858), was a companion case to the more well-known ''Fellows v. Blacksmith'' (1857). At the time ''Fellows'' was decided, this case had reached the U.S. Supreme Court but had not yet been argued.〔(Joshua L. Brown ), (The Tonawanda Indians ), Letter to the Editor of the ''New York Times'' (February 4, 1858).〕
Members of the Seneca tribe had obtained a writ from the New York courts, under New York's state nonintercourse act, expelling the Ogden Land Company and their grantees. The defendants, before the Court, unsuccessfully challenged the state statute under the Indian Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, the federal Nonintercourse Act and the Treaty of Buffalo Creek between the federal government and the Senecas. Because the Senecas relied on state law, and the defendants relied on federal law, the case is essentially the inverse of the litigation of aboriginal title in the United States over the next 150 years.
==Background==

The Treaty of Buffalo Creek (1838) provided for the removal of the Senecas to modern-day Kansas, with their land to pass to the Ogden Land Company. The Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians on the Tonawanda Reservation condemned the treaty, arguing that no sachem from their Band had signed. Prominent Seneca Ely S. Parker had retained lawyer John H. Martindale, who had brought four lawsuits against the Ogden Land Company and their grantees. The first two failed in the New York Supreme Court and New York Court of Appeals, respectively. The third, ''Fellows v. Blacksmith'' (1857), prevailed in the Court of Appeals and U.S. Supreme Court. In the fourth, ''New York ex rel. Cutler v. Dibble'', a divided Court of Appeals had sided with the Seneca and the U.S. Supreme Court had agreed to hear the case at the time ''Fellows'' was decided.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「New York ex rel. Cutler v. Dibble」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.